🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' innocence". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a solid first step," said the parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills requiring parental consent for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to copy this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this global discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers internationally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.